Re: f11 X "hang"

[Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>]

Adam Jackson wrote:
> IWBNI screen(1) had a mode where it would track the visible area
> updates, and if they're not being processed, coalesce them internally
> until its output queue is drained and then send them all as one big
> screen refresh.  If it did, then you could run strace under screen and
> avoid this livelock; g-t might get swamped for a while, but strace
> wouldn't, so ekiga would always be able to advance.  But it doesn't, at
> least not that I've been able to find.

Won't redirecting the stderr output to a file work?

        Kevin Kofler