[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: "yum update" with most of the rpms already on a USB key?
- From: seth vidal <skvidal fedoraproject org>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: "yum update" with most of the rpms already on a USB key?
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:03:34 -0500
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 08:57 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i thought of that and was fairly sure it would work, but that
> approach has two issues:
>
> 1) i wasn't *absolutely* sure that yum doesn't squirrel away any
> accompanying meta-info as it's populating /var/cache/yum so i was a
> little nervous about just dumping a pile of extra rpms in there which
> yum itself didn't stash there.
put the files in /var/cache/yum/$repoid/packages
yum won't care.
>
> 2) on some systems, /var might be a separate filesystem and just isn't
> capable of handling 1 or 2 Gig of packages tossed into it. (yes,
> yes, symlinks, i know. :-)
symlinks, yes.
>
> hence wanting to specify an additional local repository to be used
> in conjunction with the standard online one. i'm still a little
> nervous about the earlier suggestion of:
>
If you want to setup a local repo, go right ahead.
Then add that path as another repo in your yum configs.
Then set the cost for that repo to something lower than 1000 (man
yum.conf /cost)
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]