[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Interesting comments
- From: John Summerfield <debian herakles homelinux org>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Interesting comments
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:10:04 +0900
Adam Williamson wrote:
Priority and severity can be set by reporters in MDV Bugzilla. It was my
experience that reporters would frequently inflate these values in their
initial reports. However, if a triage team member then re-set them to a
Last I looked (which was a while ago) there was no apparent definition
of that these mean. Let me think:
Critical - system unusable
Serious - system usable with some impairment, or critical but with a
workaround.
Moderate - causes occasional outages, misleading diagnostic messages
Cosmetic - spelling/grammar errors
Enhancement Request - not exactly a bug, but ....
Everyone would probably agree that, if the system won't boot, that is
critical. I would expect such a critical error would be a candidate
release blocker.
Probably, most would also reckon that a daily crash would qualify as
critical, as would any major component such as X failing.
As a user, I see Xen failures as critical. I bought a computer, with
hardware virtualisation, just so I could use Xen. _I_ might accept that,
on the above scale, it might be classified as "serious," but anything
less would annoy me.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa coco merseine nu Z1aaaaaaa coco merseine nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]