[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Bug workflow page revised



On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 00:58 +0200, Niels Haase wrote:
> 2009/5/6 Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>:
> > Hi, guys.
> >
> > I just got a bit inspired by a QA meeting discussion, and have made
> > substantial revisions to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow . It should
> > now be a lot more comprehensive and informative about the whole Fedora
> > cycle (and it's also in the right order!)
> 
> Looks good, but I was wondering about the CURRENTRELEASE, DEFERRED and
> NEXTRELEASE resolutions. You wrote that this are used only for the
> RHEL workflow, but if I look at this list http://tinyurl.com/dbaae5
> (all closed bugs from NetworkManager in F10) it shows up many of the
> above resolutions. Sometimes they are set (wrongly) by the developer
> or, with seams to be more problematic, by updates fedoraproject org,
> like here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=492246 . It
> looks wrong for me, or did I missed something?

That's interesting, we'd have to check that. AIUI those resolutions just
don't apply to Fedora. ERRATA is what should be used when an update is
released, so any bots should I think be changed to use that.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]