Shouldn't the fact that beagle doesn't work with both firefox and thunderbird be a release blocker?

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 05/22/2009 01:48 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:24 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>    
>> I think search is, nowadays, critical functionality, not only because
>> it is widely used, but because it is built into those other two big
>> operating systems Linux is competing with.
>>
>> I think putting out a release in which search is non-functional for
>> the two most important types of data (email and Web pages), when
>> search was functional for those two types of data in the previous
>> release, would be extremely unwise and a big black eye for Fedora.
>>
>> While I understand the need to have relatively sane criteria for what
>> constitutes a release blocker, it is also, as the ReleaseCriteria page
>> points out, essentially a subjective judgment, and in this case I
>> think that looking at the forest, rather than the trees, would lead to
>> the conclusion that F11 shouldn't ship with these two bugs unfixed.
>>      
> If we installed Beagle by default I would probably agree with you, but
> since we don't I don't think these bugs should be considered a blocker
> for release.  But hey that's just my opinion, maybe the QA leads think
> differently.
>
>    
Agreed

Since this is not part of the "default install" it should not be considered
a blocker bug.

JBG
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: johannbg.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 356 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090522/2cb5162a/attachment.vcf>