[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: nspluginwrapper help request
- From: Michal Jaegermann <michal harddata com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: nspluginwrapper help request
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:06:07 -0700
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 10:38:51AM -0700, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
> My actions:
>
> I unpacked the tarball and put libflashplayer.so into
> /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins.
Quite likely this will get you into future troubles when eventually
an rpm-package version will appear; unless you will remove all
traces of libflashplayer from your system before attempting an
installation of such package. Immitating a layout of existing
packages, i.e. libflashplayer.so in /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/ and a
link in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins is likely safer.
> Does nspluginwrapper automatically detect the addition
> of a plugin and 'wrap' it?
No. Package scripts will do that job. What selinux will do with
this is another question. A run of restorecon may help with
labelling.
> The nspluginwrapper documentation states that one run:
>
> nspluginwrapper -i
That script is really called mozilla-plugin-config. See this:
$ rpm -ql nspluginwrapper.x86_64 | grep /bin
and try
mozilla-plugin-config -h
for more information.
Michal
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]