Re: Desktop-effects

[Adam Jackson <ajackson redhat com>]

On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 16:54 -0500, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
> Ray Strode wrote:
> >> But desktop-effects has more strings than just the desktop file.
> >>     
> >
> > Ah right...We should just upstream it at elvis, I guess.
> >   
> Desktop Effects is already checked into elvis.

Since we're on the subject, it was pointed out to me the other day that
the desktop-effects source is missing copyright and authorship
statements.  We can assume Red Hat owns the copyright, but it would be
nice to know who wrote it too.

- ajax