On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 15:14 +0100, Bart Couvreur wrote: > Yeah we're certainly gonna loose some people, esp if we're gonna require > the CLA[1] to be signed (something that has to happen in other Fedora > subprojects). On the other hand we don't have any clue who's active in > translation. This move could help in getting a better look on who > actually does stuff around here, right? CLA: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/CLA I have been working on a version that is easier to understand, but it has not been approved yet. The CLA gives the Fedora Project a clear legal ability to use and distribute the contribution as part of the distribution. Certainly seems like something good to have for translations, right? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part