Need to break string freeze for system-config-samba bugfix

Nils Philippsen nphilipp at redhat.com
Sat Sep 8 10:36:02 UTC 2007


Hi,

On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 00:58 +0200, Xavier Conde Rueda wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2007/8/30, Domingo Becker <domingobecker at gmail.com>:
> > > I've already built the system-config-samba-1.2.48-1.fc8 package (didn't
> > > know that would violate policy). This contains a new dialog which warns
> > > about unknown Samba configuration options instead of throwing a
> > > traceback, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247541
> > >
> > > IMO, it would be better to keep the new string in without it being
> > > translated than throwing it out again.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nils
> >
> > There is no problem for spanish locale.
> > But I seen yesterday that all po files vanished !
> > By the way, this module is not in i18n status page while it is in its cvs repo.
> > Translate.fpo status page seems to be showing a wrong state of this module.
> >
> 
> Same as Domingo: where is this module, please?

all system-config-* modules of mine as well as hwbrowser were moved from
CVS on elvis/rhlinux to Mercurial repositories on
hosted.fedoraproject.org. This is not to annoy or confuse you, the
translators but part of a "bigger" plan to move wholesale to Fedora
infrastructure, not only for my packages but for all where we are
upstream (in the long run), and thus allowing for different source code
management (SCM) systems than CVS. I very much hope that this plan was
outlined in the translators circles as well.

I've moved my stuff sometime in July upon receiving notice of this plan
by Dimitris Glezos (on Cc). Another part of that plan was to move to a
better translation infrastructure where you translators don't need to
know about how to use all the SCM systems used in the various projects
(some still use CVS and I believe you can still commit your changes
directly for those, some use Subversion, some Mercurial (Hg), some git),
but can do the translating with one (web-based) tool ("Transifex") that
would deal with the projects' SCMs in the background. Much to my dismay,
it doesn't seem that we're there yet.

Dim, can you please expand on this, correct my mistakes ;-) and tell us
when we can expect Transifex to be in production?

Thanks,
Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011




More information about the Fedora-trans-list mailing list