Re: Stats (not) updating correctly

["Domingo Becker" <domingobecker gmail com>]

2007/9/13, Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>:
> While the script "works", I wouldn't go so far as to say it works great.
> Especially from the point of view of a maintainer.
>
> The automerge currently ends up doing one commit per update which is
> pretty annoying from the perspective of looking at the commit history of
> the project.  With CVS, it matters slightly less since revision history
> is only really per-file, but with a sane SCM, having 50 changesets in a
> row that are "automerge translations" is going to be a quick way to
> making a lot of people unhappy.
>
> And really, the automerges probably shouldn't even be committed.  They
> are zero difference as far as the output .mo file is concerned which
> means that the changes are a lot of noise as far as the source control
> is concerned :/
>

Damn !
You're right about this.
I haven't thought about it.
As a programmer I use CVS revision history and it is important to me.

Other ideas to make transtators life easier ?

Domingo Becker (es)