Re: Defining Minimum Criteria for I18N Support

[Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel <ankit redhat com>]

Rahul Bhalerao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think the term 'Language Support' has been used in more vague sense
> so far (please correct me if I am wrong).  Also there has been a
> difference between a language being supported technically and a
> language that is supported with all the localization. Thus there has
> been a need to define the terms with more clarity. I think it would be
> good if we have two different sections for a language support namely,
> i18n and l10n.
>
> Recently I have tried to formulate a minimum criteria for a language
> to have "I18N Support". The same is documented here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/LanguageSupportCriteria
>
> On the same lines we may even have similar criteria for l10n support.
> I would like all to do a little review of the above and provide some
> feedback so that we could finalize this.
>
> Thanks,
>   
Hi everyone,

It's really good idea posted on the list, and we should also have 
defined the criteria in terms of l10n like i18n does.

Are we going to have any FLP meeting this month?

If yes, we can include the "$subject" in the discussion topics to define 
the criteria...

Thanks!

--
Regards,
Ankit Patel
http://www.indianoss.org/