On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:54 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote: > Runa Bhattacharjee wrote: > > Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 20:55 +0100, Bart Couvreur wrote: > >>> The only drawback I have here is that the L10N project is pretty much > >>> divided into dozens of small parts (the teams), and that the SCo would > >>> mostly be handling infrastructural things. But then again this could > >>> that the different teams start to communicate more in the project, which > >>> is always good. (just my $0.02) > >> > >> Actually, this is not too different from any other subproject -- for > >> instance, there are small pockets of individuals or groups in Docs > >> working on, say, the Get Involved Guide, or the Desktop User Guide. The > >> Steering Committee ties everything together and makes sure everyone is > >> working toward overall goals in a consistent and logical fashion. > > > > Can we perhaps have this as a discussion item for the meeting tomorrow > > (in case we are having one)? > +1 meeting. > I will be there at usual time. I'll be logging because of the Fedora Board meeting occurring during that time. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part