No commit to /cvs/elvis/specspo possible

Noriko Mizumoto noriko at redhat.com
Wed Mar 5 01:11:30 UTC 2008


Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Peter Reuschlein
> <fedora-ml at reuschlein.de> wrote:
>> Hi together,
>>
>>  i just tried to commit some changes to the moved elvis specspo (now
>>  located at /cvs/elvis/specspo. But im currently not allowed
>>
>>  [15:10] <mmcgrath> petreu: you're not in the "specspo" group to commit.
>>  [15:10] <petreu> hmm
>>  [15:11] <mmcgrath> technically "cvsspecspo"
>>
>>  Who do i have to sleep with to get access to that group. Or is it
>>  restricted to the transifex system.
>>
>>  Specspo files are pretty big so its much more comfortable to commit them
>>  via cvs.
> 
> Submitting to specspo should work fine via Transifex. If not, please
> let me know.
Just I would like to share my little discovery this morning, if you have 
same question where are they.

We can submit both desc and summary under Destination File of Specspo, 
there are desc/ja.po and summary/ja.po to choose. If you create new, 
follow the structure.

noriko

> 
> In terms of command line: We discussed this briefly in the meeting,
> and I also got Infra's feedback. Permissions to a repo is not
> something we can decide -- it's the maintainer's call. If some
> translators feel more comfortable using the command line for specspo
> (and any other module), they can request membership to the respective
> FAS group (in this case cvsspecspo). This is something a translator
> could always do, and will be able to do. Transifex doesn't substitute
> our existing processes, it only allows us to overcome this step of
> creating accounts.
> 
> Technically we could do it if it's very important, but it will put
> more work on Infra, something I'm trying to avoid as much as possible.
> Since the web interface works, until the CLI lands, I'd suggest to
> keep things simple and work with the existing solutions we have.
> 
> -d
> 
> 




More information about the Fedora-trans-list mailing list