Remove specspo statistics?

[Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel]

Alexander Todorov wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | Can we remove specspo/desc, specspo/summary statistics from the
> | individual language statistics page? I am not sure about other teams, I
> | personally don't like to see it on Gujarati Statistics page. So, I 
> would
> | like to remove specspo statistics from
> | http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/gu/fedora-9 page.
> |
> | I would like other teams to opt-in, if you also prefer to do the same.
> | May be, we could request the infrastructure team or Dimitris to remove
> | the specspo statistics from the individual language statistics page.
> |
>
> Before other teams can opt for this can you share your reasoning? Do 
> you simply
> don't like these particular two because they are extremely large? I 
> guess users
> who don't speak English will be happy to see package descriptions in 
> their
> native language. Why removing them from the stats page then?
>
Hi,

Just look at the statistics of the module "specspo". 
http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/specspo Do you see any 
language completed more than even 50%? No...

The reason is obvious, it's too huge to translate and another reason 
would be I think, it's not really important for the "end users" too, who 
actually use "Localized Desktops". For them package summary or 
description doesn't make much difference as they understand the use of 
packages through help files/manuals only. They don't go by RPM specs - 
summary or descriptions I think. So, most of the language coordinators 
are not translating this package.

So, I would like it to be removed from the *individual language 
statistics page only*, Not from the "individual module translation 
statistics page".

It will help me to track the progress of translation of my language, for 
the important/core packages only.

Still, I am not so keen on getting this removed from the statistics 
page, but thought may be other language coordinators too thinking the 
same thing, so expressed my idea.

Thread is open for the inputs I think...
> Thanks,
> Alexander.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFH3mJKhmd3WOiFct4RCkaKAJ0XV5WliRs9+Y9S0t8mgwnIYJyr9gCgp6vn
> y/YvInhaxWbRKAoKTBbzw20=
> =XQe1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Regards,
-----------------------------------------------------
Ankit Patel             	    Mob: +91 9890772942
Supervisor, Localization Services   Ph: +91 20 40057372
Pune - India            	    Fax: +91 20 66056040
-----------------------------------------------------
http://www.indianoss.org/