[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Updated repos for Docs
- From: "Dimitris Glezos" <dimitris glezos com>
- To: "For participants of the Documentation Project" <fedora-docs-list redhat com>, "Fedora Translation Project List" <fedora-trans-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Updated repos for Docs
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:57:58 +0300
2008/10/10 Paul W. Frields <stickster gmail com>:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:30:48AM +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
>> 2008/10/10 Paul W. Frields <stickster gmail com>:
>> > The following docs and branches now exist for Documentation:
>> >
>> > about-fedora: f8, f9, master
>> > homepage: f8, f9, master (may be deprecated)
>> > readme: f8, f9, master
>> > readme-burning-isos: f8, f9, master
>> > readme-live-image: f8, f9, master
>> > release-notes: f8, f9, master
>> > install-guide: f8, f9, master
>>
>> Cool. Which ones of these do we want added on Tx and stats?
>>
>> If we aren't planning on publishing updates of the older docs, then
>> maybe we shouldn't bother adding them at all. Relnotes' last stable
>> version *does* get updated with new translations (the past months some
>> people might have committed stuff to f9) and the updates get published
>> on docs.fpo. Does this happen with `readme` too? If not, and commits
>> there will never get published on f9, then we might as well just have
>> just 'master' enabled.
>
> I don't see a reason for any branch other than 'master' to be carried
> in Transifex.
All docs exist in Transifex with the 'master' branch.
-δ
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos jabber org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]