On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 01:59 +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Fabian Affolter <fab fedoraproject org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Paul mentioned [1] that it would be a good idea to move L10n relevant > > documents, like TQSG, from Docs CVS to FedoraHosted. > > > > What do you think about that step? > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461762 > > CVS is a pain in many ways, especially for the Infrastructure team. > > We'll lose the ability to commit from the command line, but most > people don't use that anyway. And for those who want to review before > submitting, I think we could add a couple of useful (git) commands to > checkout the docs (basically just clone, pull/update and switch > branch). > > I'd like to move the /cvs/l10n too to maybe an hg repo soonish. > Whenever I update our DL instance hosted there I lose some of my hair. I have some intro git docs here: https://fedorahosted.org/release-notes/wiki/HowToHelp If anyone who is more git-savvy has some suggestions -- especially for the section on "Merging and Pushing" -- they're appreciated! -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part