[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
DL listing vs. TX listing
- From: Noriko Mizumoto <noriko redhat com>
- To: Fedora Translation Project List <fedora-trans-list redhat com>
- Subject: DL listing vs. TX listing
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:21:05 +1000
Hi DL and/or TX maintenance teams
I gone through the two listings quickly, and found the following
difference. If there is obsolete modules listed, please kindly remove?
For rest any idea?
[The modules listed on DL but not in TX]
(which means translators can not submit via TX)
- desktop effects
- system-config-display
- system-config-language
- system-switch-java
[The modules listed on TX but not in DL]
(which means translators unlikely work)
- audit-viewer
- libvirt
- liveusb-creator
- mlocate
- newt
- pam
- pam_krb5
- passwd
- pkinit-nss
- redhat-config-language
- revisor
- samadhi
- sectool
- system-config-services
- yumex
Thanks
noriko
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]