[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: DL listing vs. TX listing
- From: "Dimitris Glezos" <dimitris glezos com>
- To: "Fedora Translation Project List" <fedora-trans-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: DL listing vs. TX listing
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:05:19 +0300
2008/9/23 Adam Pribyl <pribyl lowlevel cz>:
> But those
> discrepencies are really confusing. There is already bug iniciated by me.
We tried to keep the names consistent in the 75+ modules registered on
Tx. I guess the pulseaudio ones slipped our attention. :-)
> [...] What I found: e.g. when you download a
> .po file for PackaKit from modules page, you translate it and try to submit
> it via submit page, then you see that the file you are submiting to is
> completely different.
Maybe this is because the PO file provided from the modules page is
already msgmerged with the POT?
To test, download the PO file from the PackageKit VCS (this is the one
you're overwriting), msgmerge it and compare it with the one you
received from the modules page.
While I believe clean UIs and things 'just working' are good, in this
case I think we should *increase* the verbosity of our web tools, so
that people can know exactly what's happening. For example, the module
page could detect if the msgmerged file is different from the original
PO file, warn if different, and provide links to both.
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos jabber org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]