[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Release-note is long and hard for translating
- From: Dimitris Glezos <dimitris glezos com>
- To: Fedora Translation Project List <fedora-trans-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Release-note is long and hard for translating
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:50:05 +0300
2009/5/6 Ruediger Landmann <r landmann redhat com>:
> Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
>> During today's FLP meeting, another idea came up to address this issue
>> from l10n team side that is to break the file in small chunks.
>> Could you kindly assess the feasibility and the scope of this idea?
>>
> As some of you know, Publican works with multiple small po files rather
> than the one big po file that you're seeing at the moment. In fact, to
> build the documents, the docs team has to break up the po files that
> translators are contributing so that we can feed the multiple small
> files back into Publican.
>
> On 29 April, Dimitris announced that Transifex 0.6 has support for
> multiple po files in the same component and that Fedora's Transifex
> instance will be updated to this version after Fedora 11 is out. You can
> see a screenshot of this feature on the Transifex page here:
> http://docs.transifex.org/releases/0.6.html (scroll down to "Multiple
> files per language").
Rudi, I think the translators are mostly worried that the document as
a whole is large, not that the PO files themselves are large.
The Q I have is: Should we continue pushing the big release notes, or
should we consider either reducing their size or producing a compact
version which will be more easy to translate and probably more
compelling to our users as well, similar to eg. GNOME release notes?
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos jabber org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]