[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [fedora-virt] does "qemu-launcher" really need "qemu" as a dependency?
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday crashcourse ca>
- Cc: Fedora Virtualization Mailing List <fedora-virt redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] does "qemu-launcher" really need "qemu" as a dependency?
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:39:38 +0100
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:16:13AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> for the sake of anal-retentive and pedantic testing, i decided to
> remove a random qemu system emulation package (in this case,
> qemu-system-arm) with:
>
> # yum remove qemu-system-arm
>
> and the result was to remove qemu-launcher as well. was that really
> necessary? does qemu-launcher really need the entire "qemu" meta
> package as a dependency?
Not sure really. NB, 'qemu-launcher' is not part of the qemu source
package, so we've not touched it at all in recent qemu RPM refactoring.
It is a completely separate project, so best to file a BZ against the
qemu-launcher component, unless the maintainer happens to be lurking
on this list....
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]