[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [fedora-virt] does "qemu-launcher" really need "qemu" as a dependency?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday crashcourse ca>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: Fedora Virtualization Mailing List <fedora-virt redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] does "qemu-launcher" really need "qemu" as a dependency?
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:16:13AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > for the sake of anal-retentive and pedantic testing, i decided
> > to remove a random qemu system emulation package (in this case,
> > qemu-system-arm) with:
> >
> > # yum remove qemu-system-arm
> >
> > and the result was to remove qemu-launcher as well. was that
> > really necessary? does qemu-launcher really need the entire
> > "qemu" meta package as a dependency?
>
> Not sure really. NB, 'qemu-launcher' is not part of the qemu source
> package, so we've not touched it at all in recent qemu RPM
> refactoring. It is a completely separate project, so best to file a
> BZ against the qemu-launcher component, unless the maintainer
> happens to be lurking on this list....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494846
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
http://crashcourse.ca
http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]