[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: Dom0 kernels



On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:06:57PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
The repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ is up to kernel
2.6.29-1.2.18.fc11 . This one is based on push2/xen/dom0/master rather
than xen/dom0/hackery which should be closer to what is proposed for the
2.6.30 merge. It also has CONFIG_HIGHPTE=n (for x86), but my attempts to
add squashfs 3 in addition to squashfs 4 didn't work as it seems you can't
build both.

I'm about to try out these kernels, but have one quick suggestion.
Add the string 'xendom0' or 'dom0' into the Release: tag of the RPM
builds. This'd just make it clear for people installing it which kernel
is the Xen dom0 enabled one, and which is not :-)

I have added xendom0 to the name of the latest build
( 2.6.29.1-1.2.20.xendom0.fc11 )
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299170
for which the main rpms are also available from the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ I based this on the F-11 branch and since that seemed to fit best to what is currently on the upstream git repository, though an updated set of branches should appear shortly (eg. see
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-04/msg00416.html
) so this may change.

	Michael Young


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]