[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [fedora-virt] qemu/kvm status



On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 10:59 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:

> The idea is that you can have your package built on an architecture
> exclusively with BuildArch directive. But your package can then have
> a subpackage with BuildArch: noarch. That way, your package will span
> all repositories. This seems like the perfect solution to us.

Yep, that would be ideal ... as long as people don't take to throw
things at us for shipping arch specific binaries in a noarch package :-)

Seriously, it sounds like it should work really well.

>  I've
> helped them to proceed with some tests, and it seem to work. So what
> I'm plannin on doing, is post the rpms for review today, since it is
> unlikely that they will receive more updates in this mean time.
> 
> Getting them review and approved is the really important bits. We can
> set on the ideal solution a bit later.

Yep, agree.

Cheers,
Mark.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]