[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [fedora-virt] etherboot failure [was Re: [fedora-virt-maint] Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-02-20 x86_64]



On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:07:43AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 21:13 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
> > based on rawhide as of Friday Feb 20, 2009.
> > 
> > Most packages were actually built as of the F11 Alpha cut on or around
> > Feb 1.  Any newer packages in rawhide as of Feb 20 were then pulled in
> > and rebuilt, and any previously-failed packages were also rebuilt, so
> > I believe this list to be current and correct.  I did have a couple
> > servers fail during the builds, so it is possible that at most 8 of
> > these are not true failures, but a result of builders crashing. Don't
> > pin your hopes on that though. :-)
> > 
> > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> ...
> > etherboot-5.4.4-8.fc11 (build/make) ehabkost,glommer,virtmaint
> 
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/x86_64/etherboot-5.4.4-8.fc11.src.rpm/result/mock.log
> 
> ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for glibc32. Exiting.

I suppose this is not an issue anymore? I see etherboot-5.4.4-9.fc11 as
built, on Koji.

-- 
Eduardo


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]