[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [fedora-virt] Fedora virt status report



On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:30:50AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 04:41:53PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > -- GCC Bug --
> > 
> > Another issue that arose was that latest gcc is breaking plain QEMU. A
> > patch has been proposed upstream, but it's not in rawhide yet:
> > 
> >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/490512
> >      segfault in stw_kernel when qemu is run
> >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/490509
> >      GCC register allocation wrongly using ebp
> 
> IMHO, we should apply the patch to Fedora regardless of whether upstream
> think its the right long term approach. We need to have i386 qemu binary
> functional for release, even if that means carrying a temporary hack of
> some kind.

I agree. What does gcc folks think about that?



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]