[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-xen] Fedora's Xen Compared to XenExpress
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-xen <fedora-xen redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Fedora's Xen Compared to XenExpress
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:57:01 +0000
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:50:32AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> thewird wrote:
> >--- "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones redhat com> wrote:
> >>Mathew Brown wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>> I was wondering what the differences between Fedora 8's Xen and
> >>> XenExpress v4 are (besides the limits of 4GB or RAM and four
> >>virtual
> >>> hosts). Is the functionality and stability the same or is
> >>Fedora's
> >>> Xen more cutting-edge? Thank you for your help.
> >>I'm not very familiar with XenExpress, but I'm fairly sure that the
> >>management software used by XE is some proprietary code. Fedora uses
> >>
> >>libvirt and virt-manager for management, has no artificial
> >>limitations
> >>on memory, CPUs, guests etc., and is completely open source.
> >
> >Does Fedora 8 have any way to limit the network speed on the guests?
>
> I assume, though I've not tried it, that you should be able to use
> ordinary Linux mechanisms such as the 'tc(8)' command to enforce a
> traffic control and shaping on the vifX.0 devices.
Yes, if you modified the '/etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge' script you
could make it run 'tc' against the vifX.0 devices when bringing up
a guest to give it a fixed data limit.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]