[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-xen] F10 crystal ball gazing
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik iki fi>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: Xen Mailing List <fedora-xen redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] F10 crystal ball gazing
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:26:12 +0300
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:07:15AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:24:31PM +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
> > > Given that xen is entering feature freeze for updated release ~August
> > > is it too early to ask what the *hopes* are for xen in fedora10?
> > >
> > > xen 3.3.0 (or late rc) or is this still likely to be 3.2.1 or 3.2.2?
> >
> > Even though we don't have any Dom0 I'll update it to 3.3.0 for the xen
> > RPM and hypervisor. This will at least let people build their own legacy
> > Xen kernel from upstream's 2.6.18 xen kernel if they're lucky enough to
> > have hardware which works with it.
> >
>
> If pv_ops dom0 won't be ready for F10, would it be possible to ship
> xensource 2.6.18 based dom0 kernel? At least that's supported upstream..
>
> Would be better than nothing..
>
Or maybe rhel5 kernel?
I understand maintaining multiple kernels is a pain, but then again rhel5
(and xensource 2.6.18 xen) kernels are maintained anyway upstream..
-- Pasi
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]