[Freeipa-devel] [PATCHES] SPEC: Require python2 version of sssd bindings

[Lukas Slebodnik]

On (06/03/15 16:13), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Mar 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (05/03/15 16:20), Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>>On 03/05/2015 11:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>On (05/03/15 08:54), Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>>>>On 02/27/2015 09:50 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>>>ehlo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please review attached patches and fix freeipa in fedora 22 ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think the most critical is 1st patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>>sh$ git grep "SSSDConfig"  | grep import
>>>>>>install/tools/ipa-upgradeconfig:import SSSDConfig
>>>>>>ipa-client/ipa-install/ipa-client-automount:import SSSDConfig
>>>>>>ipa-client/ipa-install/ipa-client-install:    import SSSDConfig
>>>>>>
>>>>>>BTW package python-sssdconfig is provides since sssd-1.10.0alpha1 (2013-04-02)
>>>>>>but it was not explicitely required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The latest python3 changes in sssd (fedora 22) is just a result of negligent
>>>>>>packaging of freeipa.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LS
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Fedora 22 was amended.
>>>>>
>>>>>Patch 1: ACK
>>>>>
>>>>>Patch 2: ACK
>>>>>
>>>>>Patch3:
>>>>>the package name is libsss_nss_idmap-python not python-libsss_nss_idmap
>>>>>which already is required in adtrust package
>>>>In sssd upstream we decided to rename package libsss_nss_idmap-python to
>>>>python-libsss_nss_idmap according to new rpm python guidelines.
>>>>The python3 version has alredy correct name.
>>>>
>>>>We will rename package in downstream with next major release (1.13).
>>>>Of course it we will add "Provides: libsss_nss_idmap-python".
>>>>
>>>>We can push 3rd patch later or I can update 3rd patch.
>>>>What do you prefer?
>>>>
>>>>Than you very much for review.
>>>>
>>>>LS
>>>>
>>>
>>>Patch 3 should be updated to not forget the remaining change in ipa-python
>>>package.
>>>
>>>It then should be updated downstream and master when 1.13 is released in
>>>Fedora, or in master sooner if SSSD 1.13 becomes the minimal version required
>>>by master.
>>
>>Fixed.
>>
>>BTW Why ther is a pylint comment for some sssd modules
>>I did not kave any pylint problems after removing comment.
>>
>>ipalib/plugins/trust.py:32:    import pysss_murmur #pylint: disable=F0401
>>ipalib/plugins/trust.py:38:    import pysss_nss_idmap #pylint: disable=F0401
>>
>>
>>And why are these modules optional (try except)
>Because they are needed to properly load in the case trust subpackages
>are not installed, to generate proper messages to users who will try
>these commands, like 'ipa trust-add' while the infrastructure is not in
>place.
>
>pylint is dumb for such cases.
>
Yes but my patches added requires to all necessary packages.

How can I get pylint warning?
I modified spec file and make-lint was called in "%check" phase.
and I did not have any pylint problems in mock.

LS