[Freeipa-devel] [PROPOSAL] FreeIPA Test Plan Workflow
Petr Spacek
pspacek at redhat.com
Thu Mar 19 08:25:51 UTC 2015
Hello,
I do not much to add to the process itself. After first reading it seems
pretty heavyweight but let's try it, it can be refined at any time :-)
On 19.3.2015 08:57, Martin Kosek wrote:
> Test Coverage: yes/no/in progress/ /
I'm very much in favor of more descriptive names like:
covered/not necessary/test in works/undecided
It would allow random walkers by (like me :-) to understand what is going on
without necessity to study some internal processes.
--
Petr^2 Spacek
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list