[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Can't build 2.2.17 kernel
- From: Adrian Reber <adrian lisas de>
- To: guinness-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Can't build 2.2.17 kernel
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 18:57:41 +0200 (CEST)
Yesterday Harold Oga wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2000, at 16:11, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > > Try changing this
> > >
> > > CC =$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I$(HPATH)
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > CC =$(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I$(HPATH)
> > >
> > > at top of kernel makefies. The recent pre patches have logic to test
> > > for kgcc I beleive. At least 2.2.18pre15 built fine here with no
> > > tinkering.
> >
> > Ah, but how does it run? Is it stable enough to use for a
> > semi-production system?
> Hi,
> Not to be nitpicky, but care to be a tad bit more specific. What are
> you refering to with the above it? kgcc? a kgcc compiled kernel? or
> 2.2.18pre15?
kgcc is the compiler to build the kernel. it's an extra package. When i
compile 2.2.* kernels i use:
CC="kgcc" make bzImage
2.4.0-test* kernels I am building with the gcc in RH7 (gcc 2.96).
Does anybody know, if this is a bad idea? Because the kernels builds and
boots, but doesn't seem to be that stable. Is this rather because _it is_
an unstable kernel, or because of the compiler?
Adrian
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]