[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Specifying arch for rpm -ba
- From: John Summerfield <summer OS2 ami com au>
- To: guinness-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Specifying arch for rpm -ba
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:37:09 +0800
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Gene C. wrote:
>
> >Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:25 -0400
> >From: Gene C. <czar@acm.org>
> >To: guinness-list@redhat.com
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >Subject: Re: Specifying arch for rpm -ba
> >
> >On Sunday 29 October 2000 14:10, Gene C. wrote:
> >
> >Never mind .. the man page says do --target i686
>
> Please report this in bugzilla, or send it to the rpm-list. That
> is bad if the docs are wrong.
>
>
Used to work without the equals:
[summer@dugite summer]$ rpm --rebuild --target k6 redhat/SRPMS/lsof-4.51-2.src.
rpm
error: cannot open k6: No such file or directory
[summer@dugite summer]$ ssh emu rpm --rebuild --target k6
redhat/SRPMS/lsof-4.51-2.src.rpm
Installing redhat/SRPMS/lsof-4.51-2.src.rpm
Building target platforms: k6
Building for target k6
Executing: %prep
+ umask 022
+ cd /tmp/BuildRPM
dugite has rpm 4, emu has 3.something.
I say the doc's write, the program's wrong. Might be the commandline parser
(popt?) is broken in which case about half of RHL 7 is broken too.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]