[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Which Anti_Virus should I choose?
- From: Mike Burger <mburger compucomis net>
- To: <guinness-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Which Anti_Virus should I choose?
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:51:47 -0500 (EST)
Yeah, but the cost to subscribe to Symantec's update facility is something
like $5/year to continue using LiveUpdate! after the first year.
And you can still download and manually apply the updates.
If you're licensed with McAfee, they're easy, too.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 dsavage@peaknet.net wrote:
> You (and I) are looking for a functional equivalent of "Antigen" which works
> with Exchange Server. Free? Impossible. Symantec and McAfee spend millions
> maintaining their virus signature files. So much, in fact, that Symantec is
> starting to charge for updates.
>
> If I were you, though, getting client-side anti-virus software for your
> workstations would be a high priority. Personally I prefer Norton, but almost
> anything is better than nothing. Norton's LiveUpdate makes it easy to stay current.
>
> --Doc Savage
> Fairview Heights, IL
>
> > I have a RH7 server (that also acts as a gateway to internet) and 10 Win98
> > workstations. I would like to have at least all POP3 traffic to be check
> > for viruses centrally on the server. What good anti-virus program is there
> > without shelling out big bucks (free would be good)?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> This message was sent from Peak Internet Access.
> http://www.peaknet.net/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guinness-list mailing list
> Guinness-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/guinness-list
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]