Re: Is rhn a no-working sleazy ripoff

["A. Konstam" <akonstam trinity edu>]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:37:02PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> "Mike Chambers" <mike@netlyncs.com> writes:
> 
> > If I read the articles right on the web site, this pay services is for using
> > more then the one system manager in which the first one is for free.
> > 
> > I don't think you have to pay just to use up2date but you do when you use
> > more then the one system manager to helping to keep more then one system
> > updated via administration.
> > 
> > Is this correct or somewhat correct?
> 
> I don't think so.. I fooled around on that page quite a while thinking
> the same thing.  It seems to say that, but none of the boxs like for
> upgrading or actually setting services for an host would work until I
> paid.
> 
> Service level said "no service" [upgrade]  The upgrade link would not
> allow me to move a host into useable [available] status.
> 
> up2date would not work until I paid either... returning something like
> authentication not making it.
> 
> Once I paid, I get a different error as described.
> 

-s 
nally I find this confusing since up2date works on all out RH 7.0 machines aand
we haven't paid. I guess I should not tell anyone about that but as I said it is
confusing.
-------------------------------------------
Aaron Konstam
Computer Science
Trinity University
715 Stadium Dr.
San Antonio, TX 78212-7200

telephone: (210)-999-7484
email:akonstam@trinity.edu