[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[K12ltsp-list] Re: K12LTSP: Moving ltsroot out of /tftpboot
- From: Eric Harrison <eharrison mail mesd k12 or us>
- To: <k12ltsp riverdale k12 or us>
- Cc: <discuss-list lists sourceforge net>,<etherboot-developers lists sourceforge net>,<k12ltsp-list redhat com>
- Subject: [K12ltsp-list] Re: K12LTSP: Moving ltsroot out of /tftpboot
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 20:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>I want to move the location of the ltsroot directory.
>I've been talking on and off about this for many months now,
>and it's finally time to do it, before the next release of ltsp.
>
>Currently, it exists in /tftpboot/lts, and I just really think
>that is not the correct place for it.
/tftpboot/ is the traditional place for all things booting via TFP.
On the other hand, anyone using a system so old or obscure that it
is difficult to change that should have no problems moving the LTSP ;-)
>Here are some of the suggestions:
>
> /var/lts
Falls in line with Red Hat's /var/www & /var/ftp, for better or worse.
> /var/opt/lts
> /var/local/lts
> /var/lib
> /var/lib/lts
/var seems like an odd place for something as static as the LTSP.
> /usr/lib
> /usr/lib/lts
LTSP is not a library as well.
> /data
> /export
> /public
> /srv
> /sys
adding directories off of the root feels odd as well.
Perhaps /usr/share/... would be more natural?
>A few people on the FHS mailing list told me that there was work
>towards putting things like the files that Apache serves into
>"/srv/www" or "/srv/http".
<grumble, grumble> I guess I could live with that as long as other
such services were moved there and everyone promised to never move
the apache or ftp root again ;-) <yes I'm lazy!>
>So, any comments?
>
>If so, please send them to me pronto. I'd like to put a 2.09pre2
>package together really soon, so people can test the directory move,
>and other new features like:
>
> Kernels with NFS swap built-in
> 2.4 kernels
^^^^^^^^^^^
In my experience, "legacy free" terminals work much, much better with a
2.4 kernel.
> devfs
> XFree86-4
^^^^^^^^^
Has anyone tried playing hardware-accelerated games on a terminal? This
seems like an interesting possiblity ;-)
I can verify that Tux Racer and Chromium do no play well on an unaccelerated
terminal.
> Better support for Local apps
>
>I'd like to get the 2.09-final out before Linux World at the end of
>this month.
See you at LW, the first round of beers will be on me Jim. Thanks again for
all of your great work!
-Eric
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]