Re: [K12OSN] 3.1.2 vs 4.0 beta9 adventure

[Julius Szelagiewicz <julius turtle com>]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Eric Harrison wrote:
> There has been very little testing as well,  I'm half-way through
> the first attempt to upgrade from v3.1.2 to v4.0beta9. Who knows
> what bugs that will shake out.
Adventure is our common middle name, n'est ce pas?
	updated 3.1.2 to 4.0beta9. forgot to add apt repository for beta,
run apt-get dist-upgrade, got *older* kernel, added repository, run
apt-get dist-upgrade, complaint about signatures, being adventurous,
disable signature checking, run dist-upgrade again, rpm database went
kaput. stopped there. the laptop works fine and even my reversed eth0 /
eth1 assignments are preserved. the terminals boot and all the big apps
work fine, so i think the update procedure works just fine, and maybe i'll
even run the rpm database fix ;-)

thank you Eric. julius

p.s. i just wish that RH / Fedora would make ACPI enabled kernels the
default, so i might get the built-in wireless working in the laptop.