[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [K12OSN] Release cycle too fast
- From: Eric Feldhusen <efeldhusen chartermi net>
- To: "Support list for opensource software in schools." <k12osn redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [K12OSN] Release cycle too fast
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 15:50:06 -0500
--- Jim McQuillan <jam mcquil com> wrote:
What you've described below is exactly how apt works with debian.
and I think that's how yum works on fedora.
Jim McQuillan jam Ltsp org
Rob Owens wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Just to be clear, are you saying that I can apt or yum from one
> release version and end up with the latest release version? for
> example, using yum to upgrade from FC2 to FC3.
>
> -Rob
According to guys on the fedora lists, exactly. But I've never done it
myself, so I can't give you the specifics.
Some of the posts on the fedora list have had guys going from redhat 6.2
-> redhat 7.0 -> redhat 7.3 -> redhat 9.0 -> fedora core 1 -> fedora
core 2 -> fedora core 3 and also, some have worked from redhat 7.3 ->
fedora core 2... wild stuff. And that's using both yum and apt. From
what I've gathered, the more you've stuck with using rpm for all your
software installing, updates, and removal, the better it works for
updating. If you've done a lot of installing software from source,
creating symbolic links for libraries to make stuff work, making the
system "you" specific, updating between major version updates doesn't
work well. But, like I've said, I've seen posts from several people
that have done it.
Eric
--
NOTICE: New email address: eric remc1 org
--------------
Eric Feldhusen
Network Administrator for Adams, Chassell,
Dollar Bay-Tamarack City, and
Lake Linden-Hubbell Public Schools
emailto:eric remc1 org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]