Jim McQuillan wrote:
But he's talking about striping (RAID 0), not mirroring (RAID 1). If he stripes, and one of the drives dies, the system will die. That's why RAID 5, striping & parity, makes so much sense if you have enough disks If he's only got two disks, I'd go with RAID 1, mirroring, to get the redundancy and uptime.Sudev Barar wrote:On 12/22/05, William Fragakis <william fragakis com> wrote:We are building our first mondo server (dual core P4 3.0 ghz) and I wanted some ideas on what (and how) directories to put on the RAID (striped for speed, we have a file server elsewhere). I have a separate disk for the boot directory since I'll be using a fake SATA RAID on the motherboard. We want to serve about 35-40 desktops with the set up.IMHO With /home elsewhere on nfs what benefits are expected from raid? A SCSI drive may be better bet IAC than SATA (raid or no raid)Here's a benefit for using raid..... UPTIME!With raid, if a drive fails, the system keeps running. without raid, it dies a horrible death, and the users are sitting there wondering what to do.Jim McQuillan jam Ltsp org
Petre