[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: thoughts on kickstart
- From: Erik Troan <ewt redhat com>
- To: kickstart-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: thoughts on kickstart
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 20:40:51 -0500
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:01:30 +1000
"Ian Mortimer" <ian physics uq edu au> wrote:
> > Kickstart also gets enhanced, but it has some legacy
> > issues (many of them thanks to poor planning on my part) that folks are
> still
> > stuck with.
>
> Since kickstart is still a relatively immature product I would vote for
> improving it's design and usability as a higher priority than backward
> compatibility.
While kickstart could be called immature, it's hardly new. It's been around
for 4 years (maybe more), and we have a number of folks using it in reasonably
large implementations. Backwards compatibility is, and will remain, important.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Amazingly, there are significant numbers of 30-something women now who |
| want to learn how to box - something that most sensible American men gave |
| up years ago." - New York Times Magazine |
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]