[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: does ramdisk_size matter ?
- From: "Skahan, Vince" <vince skahan boeing com>
- To: <kickstart-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: does ramdisk_size matter ?
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:47:02 -0700
right, so if I specify a really big ramdisk_size,
I'm in good shape and I won't have to predict
how RedHat changes the required ramdisk_size
in future releases (?)
--
---------- Vince Skahan boeing com ---------
Connexion by Boeing - Cabin Network
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Malek [mailto:cmalek caltech edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:57 AM
To: kickstart-list redhat com
Subject: Re: does ramdisk_size matter ?
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 10:04:07AM -0700, Skahan, Vince wrote:
>
> In looking at the various RedHat distributions, it appears
> that the ramdisk_size=NNNN value is growing from release
> to release.
Your ramdisk_size definitely matters: it has to be big enough to hold
the stage two image. But that's all it has to hold, AFAIK.
Chris
--
cmalek caltech edu
Nosce Teipsum
Office: (626) 395-2593
Fax: (626) 792-4257
Mail Stop: 014-81
_______________________________________________
Kickstart-list mailing list
Kickstart-list redhat com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]