Re: [Libvir] PATCH: Compatability with Xen 3.2.0

[John Levon <levon movementarian org>]

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:19:16AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> Yes & yes.
> 
> The scenario where it was wrong is where you have a big NUMA system where
> not all sockets were populated.
> 
> At the same time though,  virNodeInfo is a part of the libvirt public ABI
> and thus we have to put something in that field. So I'm choosing to continue
> to the put information which matches the previous semantics, so we're no
> worse off than we always were. 

Fair enough, but could it at least be documented somewhere visible (I
suppose the header file would be OK) ??

thanks,
john