[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Libvir] what is virt-install doing differently?
- From: Aron Griffis <aron hp com>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com, Eric Schwartz <eric schwartz hp com>, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang you intel com>, ipf-virtualization redhat com
- Subject: Re: [Libvir] what is virt-install doing differently?
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:06 -0500
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [Wed Jan 31 2007, 03:40:38PM EST]
> Notice that the '(vcpus 3)' bit is duplicated twice in the SEXPR that
> xm sends - once at top level and once within (image). It looks like
> when creating HVM guests you need both set to get it to work correctly.
> Frankly this is utterly insane - XenD should simply copy the top level
> value for vcpus into the (image) block as needed.
>
> Since we need compatability with all Xen 3.0.x series codebases, it looks
> like we'll need to do a tiny bit of magic in libvirt to also send the
> vcpus stuff twice for HVM. Urgh :-(
Ugly, I agree, but I'm glad you found it...
Send me a version to test if you'd like. I'm updating the RHEL5 BZ to
reference this conversation, hopefully we can still get a fix in
there.
Regards,
Aron
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]