Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

[Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>]

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:25 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

> So far, the release model for libvirt (correct me if I'm wrong) has been 
> that you periodically bundle up the latest version of libvirt and put it 
> on the website.  There's no experimental branch where we can place 
> things like a libvirt remote patch with the proviso that at some point 
> later we can say "sorry, that didn't work".

	I'd be happy to see this stuff in CVS on a "remote branch", but it
would be quite a pain for you to maintain a branch in CVS.

Cheers,
Mark.