Re: [Libvir] The problem of the definition of tuning informations

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:06:24PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:00:10PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
> >> I don't have any objection to separating "tuning" information as long as
> >> we have the ability to merge permanent domain parameters with its
> >> "tuning" information prior to domain construction.
> >>     
> >
> >   My point is that you don't need the tuning informations to create the
> > domain, if you need them it's not tuning.
> 
> Well said Daniel - a simple point I was missing.  I repeal my objection [1].

  Hey Jim,

thanks for the update !

 and welcome back :-)

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/