[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Daniel Veillard] Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] update from gnulib
- From: Jim Meyering <jim meyering net>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: Libvirt <libvir-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Daniel Veillard] Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] update from gnulib
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:25:43 +0200
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com> wrote:
...
> Yep, I agree - its fine to update gnulib and just notify the list afterwards.
> There's nothing we can sensibly review in the patch, and after all, the
> whole point of gnulib is that other people have already reviewed & tested
> this for us :-)
Mostly true ;-)
Last night I saw a new configure-time diagnostic that may
indicate an underlying problem -- but doesn't affect any builds
or tests I've run. I'll investigate, eventually.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]