[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] Re: qemud/.libs/libvirtd?
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 gmail com>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] Re: qemud/.libs/libvirtd?
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:05:52 +0100
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:01:42PM +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I added some new code to libvirt.c, and recompile. However, when "make
> > install". qemud/.libs/libvirtd is installed but not qemud/libvirtd.
> > Why? Looks like a bug?
No, this is correct behaviour. qemud/libvirtd is not a binary - it is
a mere shell script which calls into qemud/.libs/libvirtd. This is all
part of the libtool build process.
> > The problem is that qemud/libvirtd has my new code, but not
> > qemud/.libs/libvirtd! So "make install" installs the old binary, which
> > I dont know where it is from. (Perhaps from the first compilation?)
You are mistaken - qemud/libvirtd is just a shell script wrapper.
The actual binaries are in the .libs directory.
> > I am not familiar with the autoconf Makefile, and cannot figure it out
> > why it is working this way.
> >
>
> This is not getting funny anymore. I clean src/.libs/*, and
> qemud/.libs/*, and recompile and "make install" again. This step
> installed stuffs in .libs/ into system.
Run 'make distclean' and then start again from 'configure'
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]