Re: [libvirt] <bootloader /> BUG

[Guido Günther <agx sigxcpu org>]

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:33:34AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> With the tip of DanB I am currently using the inactive XML storage quite  
> satisfied with the concept of first undefining than starting. But there  
> is still a bug.
>
> The inactive XML adds a <bootloader /> tag. Now that is (in my  
> perspective) not a bug, but it it is that libvirt expects a config. In  
> my personal believes the tag shouldn't be there if there is no config;  
> or libvirt should not
I think is similar to what I reported in February:
 http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00097.html
There's a patch attached that works around the issue but I doubt it
still applies.
Cheers,
 -- Guido