[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] [Charles_Duffy@messageone.com: [PATCH] autoport overrides actual VNC port number in dump-xml]
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] [Charles_Duffy@messageone.com: [PATCH] autoport overrides actual VNC port number in dump-xml]
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:44:50 -0400
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:33:22AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:17:59AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > Forwarding message that was sent to wrong list...
> >
> > Hum, that sounds right, the logic got twisted, the presence of
> > a defined port should otherride the autoport settings, right ?
>
> Yes, this logic was coded badly by me. What I was trying to address
> here was that the declared port should be reset to -1 for inactive
> domains, when autoport is yes. I ended up always setting it to -1.
>
> So instead of this:
>
> if (def->data.vnc.autoport)
> virBufferAddLit(buf, " port='-1'");
> else if (def->data.vnc.port)
> virBufferVSprintf(buf, " port='%d'",
> def->data.vnc.port);
>
> What I think we need is this:
>
> if (def->data.vnc.port &&
> (!def->data.vnc.autoport || def->id != -1))
> virBufferVSprintf(buf, " port='%d'",
> def->data.vnc.port);
> else if (def->data.vnc.autiport)
> virBufferAddLit(buf, " port='-1'");
>
> So the explicit port is output in XML if autoport is not set, or
> if the domain is running.
Okay +1, push the patch :-)
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]