Re: [libvirt] [RFC 5/5]: Rewrite findLuns function

[Chris Lalancette <clalance redhat com>]

Stefan de Konink wrote:
>>> Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th lun cannot 
>>> be a real entry? This assumption is wrong.
>> Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but there is
>> code below that that is.  However, the code here is generally looking for block
>> devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device.  Given that, I'm not
>> sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples?
> 
> The 0th LUN can be a perfect block device.

OK, cool, I misunderstood.  Given that, can you give me the output of:

# ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0

Just to make sure I get the right thing?

Thanks,
Chris Lalancette