[libvirt] Suggestion on commit rules when fixing breakages
Daniel Veillard
veillard at redhat.com
Thu Oct 16 13:19:56 UTC 2008
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:15:08PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> As the number of compilation options and platform grows, it gets
> more difficult for a commiter to always ensure one chunk of code
> won't give a problem in a different situation. To try to lower the
> cost of maintaining the protability I would suggest the following
> rule for commit:
> - if a recently commited patch breaks compilation on a platform
> or for a given driver then it's fine to commit a minimal fix
> directly without getting the review feedback first
> - similary if make check or make syntax-chek breaks, if there is
> an obvious fix, it's fine to commit immediately
> Note that this would remove the need to send the patch to the list
would *not* .... sigh !
> anyway (or tell what the fix was if trivial). This doesn't either
> remove the rule that 'make check syntax-check' should pass before
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel at veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list