[libvirt] Question about the specification of "virsh vcpupin"and "virsh vcpuinfo" in libvirt-0.6.1.

Takahashi Tomohiro takatom at jp.fujitsu.com
Mon Apr 20 06:04:32 UTC 2009


Hi,

Would you give me a comment on this patch? If not, please apply it.

Thanks,
Tomohiro Takahashi.

Takahashi Tomohiro wrote:
> Hi Daniel-san,
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> 
>  > virsh doesn't place any restrictions on whether those commands can
>  > be run on inactive guests. It should just try the API regardless
>  > and be prepared for any errors.
> 
> I see.
> I think that I should remove the following check from xend_internal.c 
> PinVcpu method.
> Because the latest Xen supports this.
> 
> So, I made the patch that corrected the following problem.
> "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh vcpuinfo" can not be executed to inactive 
> domains.
> 
>  > If XenD supports this then it should be just a matter of removing the
>  > check from xend_internal.c   PinVcpu method
>  >
>  >    if (domain->id < 0) {
>  >         virXendError(domain->conn, VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
>  >                      _("Domain %s isn't running."), domain->name);
>  >         return(-1);
>  >     }
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Takahashi <takatom at jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Tomohiro Takahashi
> 
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:53:16PM +0900, Takahashi Tomohiro wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have questions.
>>>
>>> I would like to know the specification of "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh
>>> vcpuinfo" in libvirt-0.6.1.
>>> "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh vcpuinfo" can not be executed to inactive
>>> domains.
>>> I think it is the specification.
>>> Is it correct ?
>>
>> virsh doesn't place any restrictions on whether those commands can
>> be run on inactive guests. It should just try the API regardless
>> and be prepared for any errors.
>>
>>> I would like to know whether the libvirt-community have a support plan
>>> for pinning inactive domains or not.
>>> Because "xm vcpu-pin" and "vcpu-list" can be excuted to inactive
>>> domains in Xen3.3.
>>
>> If XenD supports this then it should be just a matter of removing the
>> check from xend_internal.c   PinVcpu method
>>
>>    if (domain->id < 0) {
>>         virXendError(domain->conn, VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
>>                      _("Domain %s isn't running."), domain->name);
>>         return(-1);
>>     }
>>
>> Daniel
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Libvir-list mailing list
> Libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




More information about the libvir-list mailing list